Latest Posts from New America Blogs

Recent posts from all the blogs on NewAmerica.net can be found below. A full listing of all the blogs to which New America fellows and scholars regularly contribute can be found here.

Highlights from the Spectrum for Democracy Conference

  • By
  • Danielle Kehl
May 16, 2012
Publication Image

Last year’s Arab Spring brought communications technologies into focus in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. While the conversation has often been dominated by talk about social media and censorship, the post-revolutionary transition has shed light on the need to reform media and communications policy and infrastructure in the region.

Towards a New Model for International Research Collaboration: Reflections on the April YouthSave Research Advisory Council Convening and Symposium

May 16, 2012
Publication Image

By Julia Stevens and Li Zou, Center for Social Development

Cross posted on YouthSave.org

On April 17, 2012, a Symposium on International Research and Innovation at Washington University in St. Louis highlighted the experiences and insights of the international research partners in YouthSave. The event, which was hosted by the Center for Social Development at Washington University’s Brown School, drew an engaged audience of students, researchers, and program representatives with interests in international research and collaboration.

HHS Releases Second List of Chances to Vie for Head Start Grants

  • By
  • Maggie Severns
May 16, 2012

Today, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) posted the remaining 97 funding opportunities for community-based organizations, city agencies and school districts that wish to compete with current Head Start providers for Head Start funds. The new grant-making process, known as recompetition, aims to move funds away from Head Start and Early Head Start providers that were found to be deficient during recent government audits and redirect grants to new providers that appear to meet higher standards.

Focusing the Student Loan Conversation on the Average Borrower, Not the Average Loan

  • By
  • Jennifer Cohen
  • Jason Delisle
May 15, 2012

These days, anyone who follows the news can recite statistics on student debt. The media has repeated countless times phrases like “there is $1 trillion in outstanding student debt” and “borrowers have an average of $23,300 in loans.” But do these numbers really mean what the media, policymakers and advocates think they mean? Which is, do these numbers tell how much debt the typical student carries? Not at all.

First and foremost, it’s important to clarify that “$1 trillion” refers to the total outstanding balance of the entire universe of student loans. That’s all loans from federal and private sources, for undergraduate or graduate students attending or who attended any type of school. The loans could have been taken out in September of 2011 for the current school year or they could have originated in 1995 but have not been repaid yet.

Similarly, that $23,300 number, which comes from a New York Federal Reserve Bank study of a representative sample of all outstanding loan balances as of 2011, refers to the average student loan balance only for students who took out loan. It excludes students who have already paid their loans off or who did not take out any loans.

Despite their ubiquity, these numbers don’t actually paint a picture of student borrowing as experienced by the typical borrower. Yet most press accounts imply that the average student loan balance for borrowers reflects the student loan balance for the average borrower.

In fact, most borrowers carry student loan balances well below the average. According to that same study, the median student loan balance is $12,800. This means that half of borrowers owe less than that amount and half owe more. Similarly, 75 percent of borrowers owe less than $28,000, and 90 percent owe less than $54,000 currently. While the press can certainly cite the average loan balance at $23,300, they should also make clear that most borrowers currently owe significantly less.

Now consider the discussion about debt owed by recent graduates. The most recent survey for the Baccalaureate and Beyond dataset, collected by the National Center on Education Statistics, provides data on cumulative student loan balances as of 2009 for the graduating class of 2008. These data show that the average student loan balance was $25,619 for students that took out loans.

But once again, the average borrower owed far less than that amount. Specifically, the data suggest that the typical borrower (the borrower with a loan balance at the 50th percentile) owed $19,857 one year after graduation. Seventy-five percent of borrowers owed less than $33,857 and 90 percent owed less than $50,000. On the other end, 25 percent of borrowers owed less than $10,000.

It is also important to note that the Baccalaureate and Beyond data show that 65.6 percent of students took out loans. So that means that 34.4 percent of graduates of the class of 2008 had no loans to begin with.

This is why the distinction between average and median student debt, and the distribution of debt among percentiles of borrowers matters. By focusing on average student debt, journalists, policymakers and advocates are skewing the discussion on student debt toward one extreme that affects a minority of borrowers. They’ve convinced their audience (and likely themselves) that the average loan balance (which is disproportionately affected by outlier loans with particularly large balances) should drive the discussion, not the debt of the average student borrower, nor the debt levels of the majority of borrowers.

As the discussion on student debt continues, journalists, policymakers and advocates should bear in mind what the data cited above say about the typical borrower: she is in less debt than the average loan size figures would have us believe.

Podcast: Turning Around Elementary Schools

  • By
  • Maggie Severns
May 14, 2012
Publication Image

Two years ago, the federal government began distributing $3 billion in stimulus funds to some of the nation's lowest performing schools through the School Improvement Grants (SIG) program. With SIG funds, states are expected to rapidly transform schools according to program guidelines put out by the Department of Education.

Event with Louis Hyman, Author of "Borrow: The American Way of Debt"

  • By
  • Hannah Emple
May 14, 2012
Publication Image

The Asset Building Program is hosting author Louis Hyman for an event on this Thursday, May 17th to discuss his new book Borrow: The American Way of Debt. Janis Bowdler from National Council of La Raza’s Wealth-Building Policy Project will respond and offer her take on the role debt has played in the economy and consumers’ lives. You can join us in person next Thursday or watch live online.

How the Common Core Standards Could Help Restore the Curriculum

  • By
  • Laura Bornfreund
May 14, 2012

More than 80 percent of elementary school teachers, grades 3 through 5, report that they are spending more learning time on math or language arts at the expense of other subjects. This is one of the most disconcerting findings from a recent survey of 1,000 3rd through 12th grade public school teachers commissioned by Common Core, a DC-based non-profit that promotes content-rich curricula and instruction.

Issues:

A Better Way to Make College More Affordable

  • By
  • Rachel Black
May 14, 2012
Publication Image

This blog post was originaly published on the National Community Tax Coalition's blog WorkForward.

The wrangling over the jump in student loan rates scheduled to take place on July 1st has placed renewed focus on making college affordable. This is critical time to be having this conversation because the value of a college degree is only increasing in the post-recession economy, but, so is the cost of acquiring it.

Capped Variable Interest Rate Proposal Comes with a Hefty Price Tag

  • By
  • Jason Delisle
May 11, 2012

While Congress has debated extending the 3.4 percent interest rate on Subsidized Stafford loans issued this year to undergraduates, advocacy groups are gearing up for a debate on longer-term reforms. They know the odds don’t favor Congress adopting a one-year extension of the lower rate again next year. Besides, spending $6 billion to save college graduates $9 a month isn’t a great deal for borrowers or taxpayers. So it’s good that student aid advocates want a better plan. But they aren’t off to a great start. They are gathering support for an outrageously expensive proposal that turns a blind eye to far more worthy aid, like Pell Grants.

The student loan interest rate proposal that is dominating discussions among advocates and other stakeholders would provide borrowers with variable interest rates that would be capped at the current fixed rates of 6.8 percent on Stafford loans and 7.9 percent on PLUS loans for parents and graduate students.

The rate on all newly-issued federal loans would be adjusted annually based on interest rates on short-term (three month) U.S. Treasury debt, plus a markup of two to three percentage points to partially offset costs. Today, that would translate into an interest rate of about 3 percent. If short-term U.S. Treasury rates rise, the rate borrowers pay would too, though it would never exceed 6.8 percent. Such a proposal would represent a return to the policy of the 1990s and early 2000s, except the cap on the variable rate then was 8.25 percent.

This variable-rate-with-a-cap proposal would give borrowers a “heads-I-win, tails-you-lose” arrangement. If short-term rates stay low, borrowers benefit. If short-term rates rise, the loans convert to low, fixed rates and the borrower wins again. When short-term rates decline, the fixed-rate loan converts back to a variable rate, and the borrower wins again.

The policy effectively shelters borrowers from the financial tradeoffs that they would normally face when they choose between fixed and variable interest rates on loans in the private market. Variable rates are lower at first, but can go higher. Fixed rates might be higher on average, but they provide certainty.

The variable-rate-with-a-cap proposal doesn’t, however, make that fundamental tradeoff disappear. It just shifts the cost entirely onto taxpayers.

How much would taxpayers have to pay to provide borrowers with this no-lose insurance policy? According to sources on Capitol Hill, the Congressional Budget Office says it would cost $200 billion over 10 years.

To put this price tag in perspective, Congress could fund an $8,000 maximum Pell Grant (up from $5,550 today) for the next 10 years if it allocated an additional $200 billion to the program over that time period.

Still, there are other options for policymakers to modify student loan interest rates that would make meaningful improvements for borrowers without breaking the bank. One even generates savings (read more here).

Students and aid advocates would be wise to rally around some version of a more feasible interest rate reform proposal in the coming months. But if they really want to get behind a proposal that costs $200 billion, please make it one that supports the Pell Grant program rather than college graduates’ monthly budgets.

Savings Song Launches YouthSave's Financial Education Workshops in Colombia

May 11, 2012
Publication Image

By Alejandra Montes Saenz, Save the Children Colombia

Cross-posted on YouthSave.org

As part of the overall Financial Capability strategy for Colombia, Save the Children has conducted several launch events in the same schools where the implementation of the financial capability workshops will take place. The overall goal of these events is to gather the students, teachers and school staff and encourage them to start thinking about the importance of saving as a mechanism for young people to achieve their goals and dreams. We used ‘edutainment’ strategies—different forms of entertainment to deliver educational messages—to develop a fun and interactive design for the youths’ first encounter to financial capability topics, so that positive expectations could be built around the upcoming financial capability workshops.